The Two Realities

Nithin Sridhar

One of the most discussed and debated questions throughout known history have been related to the existence of man, world and God. Many theories have been put forward throughout the world ranging from denial of God to the denial of Man. The former accept only the Physical reality of the Universe and the latter condemn those who question the reality of God. It is only in the scriptures of Hindu religion, does one find not only an acceptance of existence of the God and Man but also an exposition equating the both.

Hindu philosophies explain that to understand cosmos, it is very important to first understand the frame of reference from which the Cosmos is being perceived. The scriptures speak about two different frames of references to understand the relationship between the Man, the world and the God. They are the Vyavaharika state and the Paramarthika State.

The Vyavaharika state refers to the Dual (Dwaita) state of reference. Most people understand the Universe from this plane. They perceive the duality of object and the subject. There is the world (Jagat) and there is Individual (Jiva) and the God (Ishwara) all separate. The Paramarthika state refers to the Absolute Non-dual (Advaita) state of reference, where only Brahman/Atman is. There is no difference between God or Individual or the world.  The former is a temporary and relative state of existence whereas the latter is the absolute-permanent state of existence.

Sage Yajnavalkya while discussing with his wife Maitreyi about the nature of this Cosmos says(1)-

“yatra hi dvaitam iva bhavati, tad itara itaraṁ jighrati, tad itara itaram paśyati, tad itara itaram śrṇoti, tad itara itaram abhivadati, tad itara itaram manute, tad itara itaraṁ vijᾱnᾱti. yatra tv asya sarvam ᾱtmᾱivᾱbhῡt, tat kena kaṁ jighret, tat kena kam paśyet, tat kena kaṁ śṛṇuyat, tat kena kam abhivadet, tat kena kam manvīta, tat kena kaṁ vijᾱnīyᾱt?”

It means “Where the Duality is present, there one can smell the fragrance, one can speak to others, one can listen to others, one will pay respect to others, and one can think and understand. But, where there is only Atman everywhere, what will he smell? Whom will he ask? What will he listen to? Whom will he pay respect to? What will he think about and understand?”

The first part of the address refers to the Vyavaharika state. Here, the God, Man and the world are separate things. God is the creator of the World.  The individual Jiva is the Worshipper and the God is the worshipped. The Man is the subject and the world is the object. Hence, the man experiences the sensory objects. He can see, hear, taste, smell and feel the touch. He is subject to both the pains and pleasures of the sensory world. The second part of the Yajnavalkya’s address beautifully captures the essence of Paramartika state. In the absolute state of Non-duality, no question of a Second arises. When the object and subject have merged together, what remains to be perceived? The Knower and the Known have become one in this state. “Yatra tv asya sarvam atmaivabhut”- where only atman pervades everything, there is no creature and no creation. The same Brhad Aranyaka Upanishad says in another place “neha nanasti kinchana(2)”- There exists nothing else anywhere (other than Brahman)”. In this state there is neither Dukha-pains nor Sukha-pleasures, only Anand-Bliss exists. But only a theoretical understanding of this concept of two realities will lead to blind faith and false ego.

When people read the statement “Brahmo Satyam, Jagat Mithyam, Jivo Brahmaiva Na Paraha”, many misunderstand it. They wonder, how can the God which is not visible is Real/Truth and the world which is visible is Unreal/Falsehood? Further, they question how can an Individual be same as God? Many people feel the equating of Man with God is another way of denying the existence of God. But, these assumptions are far from truth. When it is said, “Brahmo Satyam”, The Satyam here refers to the Eternal nature of existence of Brahman. Brahman being without beginning and hence without an end is Eternal. This is the absolute Truth (Satyam). On the other hand, the physical universe is in a continuous movement, where names and forms arise and die out. Hence, this world is not Eternal Truth I,e  Mithyam. Mithyam does not mean falsehood or Non-existence; it simply means “Temporary in nature”.  Further, the equation of Jiva-Individual and Brahman-God mentioned in “Jivo Bramaiva Na paraha” is only from the Paramarthika frame of reference. In the world of dualities, Man and God are indeed different even though in essence they are same. In the absolute state, no duality of God and Man arises; the whole Existence is one, which we may call as Atmam or Brahman. But most people cannot realize the Paramarthika Satya beyond logical and rational speculations.

For proper understanding of Shastras, a seeker of Paramarthika Satya must develop qualities like Viveka, Vairagya, Indriya Nigraha, Titiksha, Shradha (3)etc. It is these qualities that take a person towards Satya-Sakshatkara and hence towards Moksha. The shastras says “Brahmvit Brahmeva Bhavati(4)”- The Knower of Brahman, verily becomes Brahman. All the sadhanas, the rituals like japa, homa and puja are all aimed at purifying the mind (chitta Shuddhi) of a sadhaka by which he can develop the above mentioned qualities. These qualities in-turn will enable a person to have Atma-sakshatkara (Self-realization) and hence Moksha (final Liberation).

Footnotes

(1)   Brhad Aranyaka Upanishad 2.4.14

(2)   Brhad Aranyaka Upanisad 4.4.19
(3)   Viveka (Discrimination), Vairagya (Dispassion), Indriya Nigraha (Control of mind and senses) Titaksha (Absense of anger), Shradha (faith) etc are the qualities that are necessary for one to succeed in the path to Self-realization. Refer my article “The Two Paths”.

(4)   Mundaka Upanishad.3.2.9

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

6 responses to “The Two Realities”

  1. Maarten says :

    Hari Om! Mr Sridhar

    Being an avid enquirer into Hindu philosophy, I came across this part of your ‘Lila” article, which I am replicating here, with a question on the other end:

    “Instead, Vedanta Philosophy explains that the Brahman manifests Universe, just as rope appears snake (Vivarta vada). That is, there is only an apparent transformation of God into Universe. In case of snake, rope was the Upadana Karana/Material cause and in case of universe, Brahman is the Upadana Karana. This phenomenon of Apparent Manifestation is termed as “Maya” and the Power of Brahman to achieve it is termed as “Maya Shakti”

    There is a body of philosophy in the Advaita Vedanta that goes some levels deeper with the explanation of Apparent Manifestation or Maya: This explains Vikshepa Shakti in the context of the transformative forces of destruction and manifestation – the ‘shakti’s’, if you like, of Maya;

    My questions: Could you tell me, perhaps, about the deeper facets of Vikshepa Shakti – the Projective power of Maya? Or, could you refer me to some detailed and scholarly writings about this? (To my Knowledge, Sri Sankara was a pivotal figure who embraced, fully the Apparent manifesting power of Maya).

    Respectfully yours
    Maarten

    • Nithin Sridhar says :

      If I am not wrong, then Shankaracharya deals with Vikshepa Shakti in depth in his Vivekachoodamani. You can read that text along with a commentary on it by Sri Chandrashekara Bharati (the english translation of the commentary is available here- http://srisharada.com/vivekachudamani.htm )

      • Maarten says :

        Hari Om! Mr Sridhar!
        Thank you very much for your reply. I really appreciate it very much that you answered my request. If you don’t mind me saying this – I do think that Hindu philosophy, which I find to be the most advanced Understanding of human Spirituality and of consciousness, has something truly remarkable and deep with its understanding and reflection of Projection and the Shakti’s of Maya. thank you.

        Maarten

      • Nithin Sridhar says :

        I suggest you to also read Maya Panchakam of Adi Shankara, I am sure you will enjoy.

        -Nithin

  2. Maarten says :

    Hari Om Nithin
    I studied all the translated verses of the Vivekachoodamani of Sankara. There is a great deal to absorb and synthesize;
    Projection is one of the Great Principles of all human existence and a principle that specifically pertain to human spiritual evolution and interior Self Understanding and discovery. The understanding of the Atman, in the Western idiom of empiricism and its science of mechanics, must be unveiled in its projective context and for that we need to understand the Principle of Projection, which is, for the most part, absent from contemplation in the western Mind;
    This work enriched my Understanding beyond measure.

    A true gift, one may say, which compliments perfectly all the learning that has been done throughout my life. I am grateful.

    I had a brief look at the Maya Panchakam – loved it, thank you

    all blessings to you and your endeavours.

    Maarten

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: